<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting something for nothing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobpage.net/2005/09/11/getting-something-for-nothing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobpage.net/2005/09/11/getting-something-for-nothing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:01:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Creese</title>
		<link>http://bobpage.net/2005/09/11/getting-something-for-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Creese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobpage.net/?p=115#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think we&#039;re on a slippery slope on this 
one.&#160; Because we&#039;ve become so enamored of clicks and counts, we forget that 
there are people behind them -- who expect to get value in return for their 
information.&#160; As I say at the conclusion of my recent Web cookies report (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ballardvale.com/freeresearch/pdf/Ballardvale%20Market%20View%20-%20Cookies.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A 
New Cookie Cutter for Classifying Web Cookies&lt;/a&gt;), &quot;In the end, the Web is 
similar to the brick-and-mortar world — users are willing to offer up 
information about themselves as long as they get something worthwhile in return. 
Without that equitable balance — if Web visitors live in a world of “take, take, 
take” cookies that pull information but offer no compensating ease-of-use in 
return — Web users will view the “cookie relationship” as one-sided, 
inequitable, and one that should be terminated.&quot;&#160; It&#039;s clear to me that 
users are getting tired of take, take, take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think we&#8217;re on a slippery slope on this<br />
one.&nbsp; Because we&#8217;ve become so enamored of clicks and counts, we forget that<br />
there are people behind them &#8212; who expect to get value in return for their<br />
information.&nbsp; As I say at the conclusion of my recent Web cookies report (<a href="http://www.ballardvale.com/freeresearch/pdf/Ballardvale%20Market%20View%20-%20Cookies.pdf" rel="nofollow">A<br />
New Cookie Cutter for Classifying Web Cookies</a>), &quot;In the end, the Web is<br />
similar to the brick-and-mortar world — users are willing to offer up<br />
information about themselves as long as they get something worthwhile in return.<br />
Without that equitable balance — if Web visitors live in a world of “take, take,<br />
take” cookies that pull information but offer no compensating ease-of-use in<br />
return — Web users will view the “cookie relationship” as one-sided,<br />
inequitable, and one that should be terminated.&quot;&nbsp; It&#8217;s clear to me that<br />
users are getting tired of take, take, take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

